Biggest company you've never heard of - Anonymous employee CGI Employee Review

3.0
Feb 10, 2010
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

CGI is a Canadian based consulting & outsourcing company (ala Accenture) with a large US presence that has continued to grow & remain profitable despite the down economy. CGI has over 26,000 members & manages its growth through acquisition and a large pipeline of long term contracts. They are particularly well respected in the government sector. The people at CGI are all very friendly & they make a strong effort to communicate & be responsive to member feedback. They also seem to sincerely want to do the right thing by their employees despite the fact that this is difficulat at a large firm with many disparately located employees. For instance, I joined the firm through an acquisition & CGI was willing to grandfather my vacation time even though I would have received less time through their standard policy. CGI also places an emphasis on corporate & employee social responsibility. They have a strong philanthropy program at the coporate level & also highlight individuals who are active in their communities. They also place an emphasis on their "green" program. Additionally they have programs & activities to encourage member health & well being.

Cons

In transitioning between assignments at CGI, you are your own strongest advocate & networking is key. There is definitely the feeling of a ticking clock. The transition can be made particularly difficult if you have a family & your ability or desire to travel is limited; however, the need to travel is truly more a reality of the consulting lifestyle than it is a particular issue with CGI. While initially CGI makes a big push to "integrate" acquired employees & they do continually ask for & try to respond to feedback regarding the integration process, they seem to be a bit of a loss regarding how to manage the group acquisition of which I was a par. Perhaps this because we were not previously part of a professional services firm and for the most part are still working on-site for our former employer. Other CGI employees that joined through acquistion do speak positively about their own process & have gone on to fill very senior positions within the firm; however, as of yet that has not been my experience. I would definitely say I feel some growing pains on the part of CGI in this particular acquisition & integration process, particularly as they have had a difficult time staffing leadership positions relative to the acquisition and some leadership positions have been staffed with individuals who are not as proactive & visible as they should be.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Inclusive workplace; great benefits; supportive of personal and professional growth; decent compensation for the area; - especially given the benefits; great leadership; strong culture and values.

Cons

Can be ups and downs if you are in a more volatile area of work which has contracts come and go. AI has increased that volatility across the industry and CGI hasn’t been immune. Individuals experience can vary by manager, but it’s a very good company.

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All