Great Culture, Okay Benefits - Business Analyst CGI Employee Review

4.0
Feb 12, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Culture is very relaxed - People are great and friendly - Good starting pay - Stock options and 401(k) match are decent

Cons

- Very limited room for growth - PTO is 2 weeks, grows slowly with tenure - Health insurance options are terrible

avatar
CGI Response
2y
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback with us. We're glad to hear you appreciate the culture and people at CGI! We know people do their best work when they feel respected and have the freedom to maintain a healthy balance, and truly enjoy the people they work with. In reference to room for growth, our intent is to provide ample opportunities to grow and try new things. We encourage you to have an open discussion with your member manager about your goals and what could help you get there. There are a lot of resources available to you (like CGI Academia) to learn new skills and dive into new areas. Thank you again. Our culture is built on a foundation of teamwork, and honest input like yours helps us to reinforce what’s working well.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work life balance and great people

Cons

Low starting pay compared to other companies

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All