Get your experience and get out - Software Engineer CGI Employee Review

1.0
May 16, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Low stress for entry role

Cons

- The salary is very low - Little to no support from management - No opportunity for growth - Not remote friendly

avatar
CGI Response
1y
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback with us. We're glad you found the entry role to be low stress but understand your concerns about salary, management support, and growth opportunities. Our goal is to foster transparent leadership that is committed to helping our CGI Partners achieve their goals. We always encourage our employees to bring up concerns with their managers who can then listen and help look for a solution—whether that is adjusting your current role or helping you find a new role within CGI. We've started implementing "stay interviews" where CGI Partners can honestly share their passions, what is going well, what isn’t going well and where additional support is needed. We ask questions like, “As you start work each day, what things do you look forward to?” and “What can I do to make your experience at work better for you? Learning about your experience is important and provides insight as we continually strive to make things better.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All