They Pay You for the Inconvenience - Railroad Conductor CPKC Employee Review

3.0
Oct 29, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This is a high-paying entry-level job. If none of the cons around schedule and culture bother you, it is a good place to make some good money and have good health care and other benefits Compensation is good and under the new contract, conductors will make over $51/hour in 2024. Show up for work, and you are automatically paid 10 hours, and often get that plus some overtime. I worked a train recently, and the gross pay was over $750 for that 14-hour night. Benefits are also good.

Cons

Many of the cons to working as a conductor for CPKC are the same, or nearly the same, across the freight rail industry. The biggest con is the schedule. When you start, you work off of an 'extraboard' with a 2-hour call window. You might sit for two days as the next person to be called, or you might be called the minute you are rested from the last trip. There is no regular work schedule. There is also no vacation for the first year, though you do get 4 paid leave days. You can take one no-questions-asked sick day per month, but if a couple of them touch on your off days over a few months there will be questions which could lead to a longer period of time off without pay. Also, taking a sick day means that you will not be paid the weekly guarantee that is in place for weeks when the extra board slows down. Your PL days are by request, and sometimes you can't get the day you want because someone else has taken it. You could call off sick that day instead, but then again, there may be questions. Training is haphazard, at least in the OJT portion. After you complete it and are working, you often wonder why they didn't explicitly teach something that would have been useful for the work in front of you. Communication within management and from management to those of us in train and engine service is equally haphazard. Also, training for lower and middle management leaves the same kind of knowledge gaps as conductor training does. Once you are a qualified conductor, you are regularly "efficiency tested." A middle manager with a quota of failures to hand out will watch you work. It is usually not an adverse outcome, but there is a "gotcha" culture around these tests. This is especially true when the "gotcha" is for one of those things not specifically covered in training or that was actually taught as the correct procedure. This "gotcha" culture is so common in the industry that conductors and engineers often have "can insurance" for when they are given time off without pay.

Explore other reviews about CPKC

5.0
Dec 20, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great pay, and benefits, good environment,

Cons

First 3-5 years stressful until you get familiar and understand how railroads work.

1
2.0
May 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots of opportunities to provide value

Cons

Poor leadership at the C-level. CIO has no control over the direction of the IT landscape beyond what is dictated to her by the CEO and other business owners. The IT environment is almost solely controlled by the demands of the business at the cost of being able to manage and adapt to needs. 20 years behind the market in the adoption of cloud technology. Existing cloud strategy was built by engineers pressed into the role of architects and learning as they progressed along. No automation or DevOps presence whatsoever outside what the platform teams use to simplify their own workloads. Remote work is considered a 4-letter word and is extremely frowned upon as anything other than an as-needed and pre-approved option. Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery are still done using backups and shadow copies of key infrastructure, and those key systems are decided upon at the time the tests are planned instead of testing the company's infrastructure in its entirety. Data centers are geographically separated, but are significantly disparate in what is physically hosted and accessible. Recognition and rewards are overtly encouraged, but are covertly handed out based on the level of visibility and impact to the business and stakeholders. Senior leadership constantly touts open-door policy and approachability, but give off vibes and impressions opposite of the overt policy. The company puts on a show of being diverse and inclusive. Case in point, the hiring of a female CIO. The problem is that working within an 'old boys network' leadership, it doesn't matter how inclusive and diverse the company appears because those elements are never given the opportunity to show their value.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All