Hard Working and Passionate Staff - Case Manager Caminar Employee Review

4.0
Feb 26, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have worked in many agencies in a supervisory roles before coming to Caminar and can empathize with the unfortunate , unrealistic and challenging predicaments management and line staff are often placed in. I believe the program directors, current and former, specifically AOT, REACH, and REACH/FSP have huge boots to fill and do their best to support their staff and provide both guidance and structure to support their professional growth. They not only have to complete the day to day managerial tasks that come along with the position but they also have to support their team (2 Assistant Case Manager's, 5 Case Manager's, 50+ client consumers per team) who are working DAILY to meet the needs of our county's most high at-risk consumers. Compared to most non-profits, Caminar pays their case managers extremely well , provides weekly (often daily) supervision for their staff and encourages their ever growing education in the field.

Cons

Smaller Caseload Sizes (but understand it is typically part of the contract each program holds that dictates the case load...not management) Better Food Truck Selection

Explore other reviews about Caminar

5.0
Oct 31, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I love my colleagues, respectful work environment, flexible office/remote working. I feel lucky to work with my team. Great bosses, great CEO. Caminar's mission and the people they help are inspiring.

Cons

Nonprofit work can be challenging when government and foundation grant support shifts. The stress associated with funding is real. But, that is true for every nonprofit.

4.0
Dec 30, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I worked for Caminar's now closed Redwood House. It was an incredible experience and I learned a lot there. The program director and assistant program director were fantastic leaders and created space for learning experiences and could prove their skill through practical engagement with the clients. Training opportunities were usually well thought out and useful.

Cons

Corporate's terrible handling of the closure of numerous acute facilities that they owned. Slow and confused explanations for what needed to be done as part of the closure, resulting in the rushed discharge of clients falling onto our overworked, burnt out staff. Abysmal HR department with one of the slowest hiring rate and potential employee retention I have ever seen. Low staffing meant constant overtime and back to back graveyard shifts. Sluggish to keep wages competitive and within the needs of QoL. An increasingly detached senior management.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All