Lack of transparency - Life Sciences Consultant Capgemini Employee Review

2.0
Jan 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Large company with many clients

Cons

My experience at Capgemini was extremely disappointing. Despite all the talk about career development and finding projects that match your profile, in reality consultants are treated as interchangeable resources. When a project ends, your skills, performance, and the value you delivered do not really matter. If you are not immediately billable, you become a problem. Instead of being honest about the situation, management uses vague terms like “restructuring” while avoiding real conversations about the lack of available projects. There is very little transparency about what is actually happening. People are not told the truth about risks or timelines, and they are not given the chance to make informed decisions. You can be led to believe that new opportunities are being searched, only to suddenly be let go when nothing appears. Another serious issue is the complete lack of coordination between Capgemini and the client. Consultants are often left alone to deal with unclear expectations, conflicts, and broken communication between both sides — something that should never be the responsibility of the consultant. In the end, it becomes clear that you are just a number in a spreadsheet. Loyalty, effort, and competence do not protect you if you are temporarily without a project.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All