Onboarding - Software Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

5.0
Mar 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smooth entry to campus without any issues Good presentation about the information of company policies

Cons

The document verification taken more time There are lot of information for the fresher to understand on first day

avatar
Capgemini Response
2mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We are pleased to hear that you experienced a smooth campus entry process and found the onboarding presentations helpful in understanding Capgemini’s policies and organizational approach. Creating a structured and welcoming onboarding experience is an important priority for us, especially for fresh graduates beginning their professional journey. We also acknowledge your feedback regarding the time taken for document verification and the volume of information shared on the first day. We understand that this can feel overwhelming for freshers, and your inputs are valuable as we continue to refine our onboarding processes to make them more efficient and easier to navigate. Thank you once again for sharing your experience and for being a valued part of Capgemini. We wish you continued learning, growth, and success in your career ahead.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All