Great company to work with. - Software Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

5.0
Apr 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hybrid mode is there. 60% attendance

Cons

Exceeding Bench period time period

avatar
Capgemini Response
2mo
Thank you for sharing 5-star feedback. We are pleased to hear that you appreciate the hybrid mode of working and the clarity around the 60% attendance requirement. Providing flexible ways of working while maintaining collaboration and connection is an important focus for us at Capgemini, and it is encouraging to know that this has contributed positively to your experience. We also acknowledge your feedback regarding the bench period extending longer than expected. We understand that timely project allocation is important for continued learning, engagement, and career momentum. Your insights are valuable as we continue to strengthen our staffing and deployment processes by improving visibility into upcoming opportunities and enabling faster alignment of skills with project requirements. Thank you once again for sharing your thoughts and for being a valued part of Capgemini. Wishing you continued growth and success in your career journey ahead.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All