Capgemini review of an Associate Consultant - Associate Consultant Capgemini Employee Review

2.0
Jul 21, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Very oriented working culture. 2. Will get opportunity to work and learn domain for some of very big clients. 3. Good professional attitude. 4. Get to learn and build leadership. Leadership appreciation is good. 5. Good place to work for people at manager/senior position.

Cons

1. Hikes are not up-to the mark and not competitive as per market. That's why attrition is high. 2. Some of the projects are hectic. Can't decide the work life balance. Even though you work hard your results and appraisal will be miser. 3. Less emphasis on learning technology and developing something and build something new. Need just work to be done somehow. 4. Not a good place to start for freshers since package is less and less hikes for them and less technical learning opportunists also. 5. Each time you ask why they appraised you less, they have very common dialogues like you haven't done extra certification (even though you have no time to study after working for 14 hrs daily). 6. Sometimes, management tries to hide many problem in projects even though certain managerial issues are escalated to them. 7. Less emphasis on Human Resource Development. The employee gets unsatisfied.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All