Worst Project - Software Development Engineer In Test (SDET) Capgemini Employee Review

2.0
Nov 6, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance depends as per project

Cons

No hikes, bonus, or variable pays, should jus work for what salary you get. Management depends on project. The manager I got was worst of all, such an egoistic and phsychoitic mindset he has. Worst experience some one could ever have

avatar
Capgemini Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We’re glad you’ve highlighted that work-life balance can depend on the project. We strive to create a balanced and supportive environment, though we understand that experiences may vary.We’re deeply concerned to hear about the challenges you’ve faced with management and compensation. We recognize the importance of fair pay, bonuses, and supportive leadership in fostering a positive work environment. Your comments regarding your manager are particularly alarming, and we take such feedback seriously. We encourage you to share more details directly with HR or through our anonymous feedback on Pulse, so we can address this issue thoroughly.Your feedback is crucial in helping us identify areas for improvement. We’re committed to taking the necessary steps to enhance both our management practices and employee experience. Thank you again for sharing your perspective, and we apologize for the negative experience you’ve had.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All