Appraisal at Capgemini - Senior Consultant Capgemini Employee Review

1.0
Apr 25, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Capgemini Engineering, Bogota is just another second-rate multinational that doesn't really care about its employees or their retention. They only care about getting the job done, at the lowest possible cost, and maximizing profits, without considering the effort or well-being of those who truly sustain the company.

Cons

I received a 1-star performance rating this cycle, which supposedly indicates outstanding performance. However, I was shocked to receive only a 3% pay increase. This seems completely disconnected from the effort, dedication, and impact I've demonstrated over the past year. Most concerning is that some colleagues received a "succeeding" rating and received no raise at all (0%), while others who were promoted received only a 7% increase, including both the promotional raise and the annual adjustment! This makes it clear that there is no coherent logic or fairness in the evaluation and compensation system. It is incredibly demotivating when top performers are not rewarded fairly, especially when expectations are raised during evaluations. The lack of transparency in the process, coupled with inconsistent recognition across teams, creates a sense of unfairness and favoritism.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All