Favoritism and unclear metrics hinder growth opportunities - Anonymous employee Carnegie Dartlet Employee Review

1.0
Mar 31, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

That’s a good question, im not sure

Cons

Growth is almost impossible unless you’re besties with leader. They will constantly change your success metrics and goals just so you can’t get a promotion. But they also won’t provide you any feedback on your job, so when annuals come around and you’re confused why your performance raise was low, they will say it’s due to performance (that they never had an issue with before). There’s a high level of favoritism, and ageism.

avatar
Carnegie Dartlet Response
1mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We take all employee feedback seriously, and we are genuinely concerned to read about your experience. Providing a fair, supportive, and transparent work environment is a top priority for our leadership team. The claims regarding favoritism and ageism are deeply troubling. Carnegie Dartlet has a strict zero-tolerance policy for discrimination of any kind. We are committed to fostering an equitable workplace where all employees are valued and have equal opportunities for growth based strictly on merit. Furthermore, performance evaluations and success metrics should always be clear, consistent, and communicated regularly. Surprises during annual reviews do not align with our performance management standards. Because your review is anonymous, we cannot investigate these specific circumstances without more information. As an employee, we strongly encourage you to reach out directly and confidentially to hr@carnegiehighered.com or use our internal bias incident reporting form. We want to ensure your voice is heard and that these serious concerns are properly addressed.

Explore other reviews about Carnegie Dartlet

5.0
Feb 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are truly kind, collaborative, and mission driven. Everyone genuinely cares about supporting higher education and helping clients succeed, and that shows up in how teams work together day to day. There are a lot of smart people here, and the culture is collaborative rather than competitive. It feels like everyone wants each other to win. There are strong opportunities to work cross functionally, learn new skills, and try new ideas. There is also real room to fail, test new approaches, and learn without fear.

Cons

The pace is very fast. The work is good and meaningful, but it can feel intense at times. I also wish compensation were higher, especially given the speed and level of responsibility.

2
avatar
Carnegie Dartlet Response
1mo
Thank you for taking the time to share such positive feedback! It is incredibly rewarding to hear that our mission to support higher education resonates so strongly with your day-to-day work. We are very proud of our collaborative team, and knowing that you feel encouraged to cross-train, innovate, and try new approaches without fear of failure is the best compliment we could ask for. We hear your feedback regarding the fast-paced intensity of the work and compensation. We know how hard our teams work, and we are continually looking at ways to ensure our salaries remain competitive and that our workloads remain manageable during busy seasons. If you ever have specific ideas on how we can improve the day-to-day pace for your team, please feel free to share them with us at hr@carnegiehighered.com.
1.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The client portfolio is genuinely interesting, and the peer-level team is incredibly talented, collaborative, and supportive. There are great people working here at the execution level, and you will build strong professional relationships.

Cons

Retention and management are major issues. Turnover is incredibly high, particularly within the first 90 days for new strategists. The company conducts surveys regarding capacity, but internal data is ignored—workloads routinely exceed promised limits (e.g., managing 12 clients when internal models cap roles at 8). Furthermore, the management style leans heavily toward negative critique rather than constructive coaching, creating a lack of psychological safety. Internal mobility is also poorly handled. Toxic culture.

10
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All