employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Charles River Analytics

Is this your company?

Great Employees, Poorly Managed - Scientist III Charles River Analytics Employee Review

3.0
Feb 21, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

CRA is staffed by intelligent and hardworking scientists and engineers who work on a variety of interesting projects. The company is striving to grow beyond a small business size.

Cons

Management at the company is conservative about change. The company’s roots are in SBIr projects and funding, which continues to this day. Despite desire to grow beyond SBIR projects the company lacks the infrastructure and experience needed to prime large contracts. Staff, particularly scientists, are expected to be one man/woman shows who master business development, proposal writing, project management, subcontractor management, in additition to being masters/experts of their primary area of interest. Although the company pays lip service to base salary and annual bonuses being merit based the reality is that raises, bonuses, and promotions are much more intricately linked to proposal writing and contracts brought into the company than merit/quality of technical work.

Explore other reviews about Charles River Analytics

5.0
May 20, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

CRA is a great company to work with. The flexibility, and overall company culture is hard to find these days.

Cons

Management should reach check in with employees more often.

4.0
Jun 28, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

R&D environment with many small projects and ‘all hands on deck’ culture is good for gaining exposure to new technologies, building up a diverse skillset and learning about the business side of R&D. Opportunities for self-direction and ownership for enthusiastic proposal writers. Excellent opportunity for early career engineers/scientists hoping to build up a technical foundation.

Cons

As the company’s bread & butter, R&D proposal wins are King, and technical excellence is valued only insofar as it enables these wins. Funding opportunities are typically small and fragmented, rarely offering room for achieving the critical mass needed to truly create something of lasting value/impact. Good for research and learning, poor for developing products. The company has made unusual decisions regarding the administration of its IT infrastructure in a bid to mimic their expectation of how larger defense primes would operate, sacrificing development speed and thereby one of the few advantages a small business has over larger established players. The company has become highly adverse to taking on risk, and which is a major hurdle to growth.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All