employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Charles River Analytics

Is this your company?

Look elsewhere- you’re actually working for a tenured few - Scientist I Charles River Analytics Employee Review

2.0
Oct 29, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You get to work on interesting projects for groups like DARPA. There is a dock in Rhode Island for testing drones

Cons

No real products. Profit comes from the SBIR program. The program was almost shut down this year. There was no real communicated strategy for dealing with the main source of funding of the company going away. When teams win proposals everyone above you gets a cut for their paycheck so it is sort of a pyramid. People who profit from the company structure have been with the company for 20+ years, so you’re essentially working for their retirement account. Your effort becomes their vested share price. You’re expected to write proposals while your boss gets the credit as PI. So you do all the internal work, reports, managing, scheduling, final reports and demos, and your boss gets the external credit for their CV. Turnover is a big problem since they mandated a 3 day in the office 2 day at home hybrid schedule. Employees were not engaged in the process at all. We’ve lost whole capabilities like NLP and cybersecurity.

Explore other reviews about Charles River Analytics

5.0
May 20, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

CRA is a great company to work with. The flexibility, and overall company culture is hard to find these days.

Cons

Management should reach check in with employees more often.

4.0
Jun 28, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

R&D environment with many small projects and ‘all hands on deck’ culture is good for gaining exposure to new technologies, building up a diverse skillset and learning about the business side of R&D. Opportunities for self-direction and ownership for enthusiastic proposal writers. Excellent opportunity for early career engineers/scientists hoping to build up a technical foundation.

Cons

As the company’s bread & butter, R&D proposal wins are King, and technical excellence is valued only insofar as it enables these wins. Funding opportunities are typically small and fragmented, rarely offering room for achieving the critical mass needed to truly create something of lasting value/impact. Good for research and learning, poor for developing products. The company has made unusual decisions regarding the administration of its IT infrastructure in a bid to mimic their expectation of how larger defense primes would operate, sacrificing development speed and thereby one of the few advantages a small business has over larger established players. The company has become highly adverse to taking on risk, and which is a major hurdle to growth.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All