Pros
*A very progressive financial institution. *Given your area or market within the firm, can be very flexible as to tasks/responsibilities you would like to take ownership of and can be (stress "can be") adaptable to work and home life balance. *One will gain an exorbinent amount of transferrable skills if you keep your nose to the grindstone, absorb all that the firm associates its brand with relative to inner-workings and outside interests. *Ambassadorship - and its value - can not help but be learned, attained and gained if one embraces JPM's core business model(s).
Cons
*It VERY MUCH feels as though the inmates are running the assylum. *JPM is so far from understanding what it literally takes to manage relationships both internally as well externally -- while "banking" the money is important it is even more pressing to develop genuine relationships. *It would behoove the firm to adopt a Jim Collins attitude as he gets it right in his book Good to Great, “People are not your greatest asset; the right people are!” *If JPM went from "good to great", clients would be exempt from the burden of the firms high turnover rate; meaning, client's would not have to experience insurmountable turnover of bankers/investors/wealth advisors/trust officers, etc. relative to their accounts and they would not have to feel/experience uncertainitity with "who" is managing their assets.