Project Coordinator - Anonymous employee Crown Castle Employee Review

2.0
Jun 26, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Make your own work schedule within reason. Buy lunch from time to time. Pay is pretty good

Cons

Very disorganized and a stressful place to work. Management has no experience and doesn't communicate changes clearly. No transparency and M&Ps change and are added daily by a disconnected leadership stuck behind a keyboard. They try to promote a good culture but it's far from that...most everyone there seems to be looking for a new job.

avatar
Crown Castle Response
6y
Thanks for sharing your views on Crown with us. We're working hard to ensure we communicate clearly, as well as listening to what our people are saying. That's why we introduced the Company Conversations, re imagined our intranet news pages and launched a new mobile way of sharing your views. We also know there's more we can do to help our people leaders - which is why we launched Leading at Crown earlier in the year. We're grateful for you sharing your views and wish you every success in your current role.

Explore other reviews about Crown Castle

5.0
May 23, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work. Although there has been a lot of change over the past few years, I feel the company is back on track. Culture has been dramatically improved.

Cons

Not much at this time. Still lots of change ahead though as the company transforms into a tower focused company.

1.0
May 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Depending on who is running your team (I’ve had 3 different team leads in the 3 years that I’ve been a full time employee,) some have provided great mentoring, and have taught me a lot.

Cons

Job security is extremely unstable, and employees often feel like they are one decision away from becoming part of another layoff statistic. In my experience, women were not always treated equitably compared to their male counterparts, depending heavily on the leadership structure within the department. The company also showed limited willingness to accommodate health conditions, often searching for loopholes to minimize support, assistance, or benefits during times when employees and their families needed them most. Leadership roles often felt transactional and tied directly to the company’s immediate operational goals. For example, when a department needed growth, leadership would bring in individuals with strong industry relationships, connections, and expertise to help expand profitability and establish the department. However, once those goals were achieved and the leader’s network or strategic value had been fully utilized, the company would frequently move on from them—either through reassignment or termination—in favor of the next person who fit the company’s evolving objectives. Overall, the culture created an environment where many employees felt expendable rather than valued long-term.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All