Decent place to work. Complaints about management same as everywhere. - Senior Quality Engineer Curtiss-Wright Employee Review

4.0
Oct 29, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The product going out the door needed to be of the highest quality since the pumps were going to be used on Navy subs, so the importance of quality was usually felt throughout the plant. Small facility. They were very flexible with my schedule and my needs. Very little overtime or extra hours required.

Cons

It was an older workforce and sometimes those individuals that were "retired in place" were allowed to get away with not doing their jobs. The benefits got more expensive every year. The I.T. Department was non-extent, so efforts made to make changes and improvements were for naught. Always consumed at the end of the month with what milestone dollars they could take. Perhaps some better planning throughout the entire month could have alleviated that rush.

Explore other reviews about Curtiss-Wright

5.0
Jun 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Staff appreciate the job stability, good pay/benefits relative to the Aerospace & Defense industry, and highly professional engineering teams. Many report a strong sense of purpose and trust in their immediate colleagues.

Cons

On the downside, some reviewers cite a top-heavy, process-oriented management structure, occasional disjointed communication across departments, and strict, high-pressure deadlines.

1.0
Jul 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Brand recognition, Curtiss-Wright has lots of locations you can choose from, I get to travel and see parts of the USA

Cons

Having worked here for a relatively short period of time, my impression is that the onboarding and integration experience for new employees could be significantly improved. In the engineering department, new team members may find it difficult to establish themselves due to a culture and one particular difficult senior employee on the team that can feel unwelcoming and, at times, overly hierarchical. There appears to be a strong reliance on one specific long-tenured employee in engineering, which can make it challenging for newer staff to voice concerns, contribute new ideas, or receive consistent support. Expectations are often high, and work-life balance can be difficult to maintain during busy periods. Another area for improvement is the visibility and accessibility of HR. A stronger on-site HR presence could help employees feel more supported and provide a clearer avenue for addressing workplace concerns and improving communication. From conversations with current and former employees, I frequently heard that the culture was stronger when the company operated more like a family-run organization. Whether or not that perception is accurate, there is a noticeable desire among employees for a more collaborative, supportive, and people-focused environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All