Good company but Business Architecture management is not good - Director DTCC Employee Review

3.0
May 28, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent work-life balance with good benefits and inspiring CEO. You would get opportunity to learn lot of new things although the technology is outdated. Still 90% on mainframe technology

Cons

Lots of politics and favoritism selected few. Business Architecture Management lead is focused on self growth only impacting reportees career growth. Except Business Architecture team, the company is awesome to work.

Explore other reviews about DTCC

5.0
Jun 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good to learn and implement

Cons

Internal politics with offshore people

4.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Internal Audit's work is meaningful and provides strong exposure across risk, technology and operations. Audits tend to focus on areas that truly matter from a regulatory and risk perspective, so you're not just checking boxes. There is a genuinely strong team culture. Colleagues are competent, collaborative, and willing to help, with a good mix of experience levels that make it a solid environment for learning. There is also clear investment in employee development. Managers often have regular career discussions, and there are ongoing efforts around training, including newer areas like AI tools and capabilities. Recognition is present, and people are generally acknowledged for strong performance. Overall, it's a strong place to build audit fundamentals, gain exposure to innovation initiatives, and develop credibility within financial services / internal audit.

Cons

Internal Audit's workload is consistently high, not just during peak periods. It's common to juggle multiple audits with overlapping deadlines, alongside continuous monitoring and other responsibilities, which can make it difficult at times. Processes can be very documentation heavy and sometimes feel rigid, which is expected in a highly regulated environment but can reduce efficiency. A significant amount of time can go into formatting, reviewing and aligning work papers to methodology. Some workflows remain manual, which adds to the overall pressure and limit efficiency.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All