I knew it was too go to be true - Member Service Representative II Devoted Health Employee Review

1.0
Nov 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I see now that I’m not the only one experiencing this. At first, I thought highly of Devoted — everything seemed great in the beginning. But it didn’t take long before things changed. I now have a supervisor who is extremely unprofessional. She displayed her witchcraft spell books to the team, openly brags about how detailed the sex novels she reads are, and uses profanity during one-on-one meetings. This type of behavior is completely inappropriate for a professional setting and creates a very uncomfortable environment. I truly loved working for Devoted at first, but the leadership is disappointing. I regret leaving my previous job for this one. I did better in Telesales than I do now in Member Services. As a Tier 2 employee, I’ve been given more and more responsibilities with no additional pay. The starting pay sounds great, but the deeper you go, the more the company starts to feel like a complete letdown.

Cons

Starting pay is very good.

avatar
Devoted Health Response
8mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We are sorry to hear that you have had a negative experience within your current team. Devoted takes pride in offering a supportive, professional and encouraging environment for team members to thrive. Please reach out if you would like to continue the conversation.

Explore other reviews about Devoted Health

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Welcoming and kind employee culture -Support and strong project feedback -Clear communication -Employees believe and support the mission of the company -Enthusiastic, talented, and passionate leaders

Cons

- There are two office spaces for hybrid work- they are great facilities but there are only two

3.0
Mar 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission to serve Medicare members well was clear, and the early culture reflected that. Teams were empowered, different leadership styles were welcomed, and people were trusted to solve problems in practical ways. There are still many talented and mission-driven people at the company who care deeply about the work and about members.

Cons

As the company grew rapidly, the culture began to change. Metrics have always been a focus, which is understandable in a performance-driven environment, but the emphasis increasingly shifted toward tracking activity and “effort” rather than measuring meaningful outcomes. Smaller assignments that once would have been handled with flexibility began to receive disproportionate attention, creating an environment that often felt more micromanaged than empowered. At the same time, accountability did not always appear to be applied consistently across leadership levels, which can be frustrating for teams that are being held to strict standards themselves. Frequent performance framework changes and constant iterations also created confusion and fatigue on the ground. In several cases, supervisor turnover concentrated under the same leadership should have been treated as a signal worth examining. Overall morale in parts of the organization has noticeably declined compared to earlier years.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All