Not so Devoted to employees - Member Service Guide Devoted Health Employee Review

1.0
Sep 23, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay was competitive for the job

Cons

You are just a number here. It was a good start up to work for when I joined, but it quickly turned corporate and there was a lot of micromanaging. It’s impossible to move up or into a different role. Members are awful and cruel, but that comes with any call center. Work here if you want to be a robot all day, everyday, and suffer from emotional exhaustion.

avatar
Devoted Health Response
4y
Thank you for sharing your experience -- and we are sorry that your time with Devoted left you feeling this way. Our Member Service Guides are at the core of the care and experience we deliver for our members. We work hard to create consistent processes to give our team feedback on call quality and productivity, and we are continuously adapting these processes based on feedback from our Guides. Our Member Service Guide leadership team is committed to empowering our Guides to deliver great care to our members and to ensuring they feel safe and successful in their roles. We continue to look for ways to make sure our Member Service Guides feel connected to the organization as we adapt to being primarily remote. We are committed to supporting our employees mental health and offer a fully funded Lyra.com mental health benefit for all full time benefits eligible employees and their dependents.

Explore other reviews about Devoted Health

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Welcoming and kind employee culture -Support and strong project feedback -Clear communication -Employees believe and support the mission of the company -Enthusiastic, talented, and passionate leaders

Cons

- There are two office spaces for hybrid work- they are great facilities but there are only two

3.0
Mar 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission to serve Medicare members well was clear, and the early culture reflected that. Teams were empowered, different leadership styles were welcomed, and people were trusted to solve problems in practical ways. There are still many talented and mission-driven people at the company who care deeply about the work and about members.

Cons

As the company grew rapidly, the culture began to change. Metrics have always been a focus, which is understandable in a performance-driven environment, but the emphasis increasingly shifted toward tracking activity and “effort” rather than measuring meaningful outcomes. Smaller assignments that once would have been handled with flexibility began to receive disproportionate attention, creating an environment that often felt more micromanaged than empowered. At the same time, accountability did not always appear to be applied consistently across leadership levels, which can be frustrating for teams that are being held to strict standards themselves. Frequent performance framework changes and constant iterations also created confusion and fatigue on the ground. In several cases, supervisor turnover concentrated under the same leadership should have been treated as a signal worth examining. Overall morale in parts of the organization has noticeably declined compared to earlier years.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All