Stressful. - Member Service Guide Devoted Health Employee Review

1.0
Mar 16, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None that I can think of to help others run away from this company.

Cons

Everything! Nepotism, unprofessional, biased. Stressful. Rude supervisors. Metrics are unreasonable.

avatar
Devoted Health Response
3y
Hello! Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback with us. We’re sorry to hear that your experience thus far has been negative. We hold our Member Service Guides to high standards as a group when it comes to metrics. This not only allows us to offer superior service to our members but also ensures that we remain in compliance with service level rules and regulations established by the federal government. We recognize these regulations do create some limitations within this role but we do have other benefits and a stress reduction program to support our guides on the day to day. While it’s our mission to make sure that our members are cared for and treated like family, we hold that bar for our internal team and work/life culture just as high. We welcome the opportunity to hear more from you about your experience and perspective so that we can improve. If you’d like to continue the conversation, please reach out to Michelle Mulcahy, Director, Member Service Guide @ mmulcahy@devoted.com.

Explore other reviews about Devoted Health

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Welcoming and kind employee culture -Support and strong project feedback -Clear communication -Employees believe and support the mission of the company -Enthusiastic, talented, and passionate leaders

Cons

- There are two office spaces for hybrid work- they are great facilities but there are only two

3.0
Mar 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission to serve Medicare members well was clear, and the early culture reflected that. Teams were empowered, different leadership styles were welcomed, and people were trusted to solve problems in practical ways. There are still many talented and mission-driven people at the company who care deeply about the work and about members.

Cons

As the company grew rapidly, the culture began to change. Metrics have always been a focus, which is understandable in a performance-driven environment, but the emphasis increasingly shifted toward tracking activity and “effort” rather than measuring meaningful outcomes. Smaller assignments that once would have been handled with flexibility began to receive disproportionate attention, creating an environment that often felt more micromanaged than empowered. At the same time, accountability did not always appear to be applied consistently across leadership levels, which can be frustrating for teams that are being held to strict standards themselves. Frequent performance framework changes and constant iterations also created confusion and fatigue on the ground. In several cases, supervisor turnover concentrated under the same leadership should have been treated as a signal worth examining. Overall morale in parts of the organization has noticeably declined compared to earlier years.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All