NOPE - Member Service Representative Devoted Health Employee Review

1.0
May 11, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent benefits. Remote work. That’s pretty much it.

Cons

Nepotism truly runs rampant- all you have to do is look at the leadership reporting structure and you’ll see family members reporting to other family members. Absolutely insane. Leaders lack compassion, empathy, and emotional intelligence.

avatar
Devoted Health Response
3y
Hello! Thank you for taking the time to share your perspective and experience with us. We’re happy to hear that you’ve enjoyed the ability to work remotely with us! We’re pleased to be able to offer this benefit at this time for this role. We’re sorry to hear that your experience thus far has been less than optimal. Devoted Health encourages all employees to share information on open positions to qualified friends and former colleagues. We do not make hiring or promotion decisions based on existing or previous relationships. Currently, it is not permitted to have family members report to one another in any department at Devoted. We’re sorry to hear this was not the perspective or experience you have had. We recognize that all experiences and perspectives are different and welcome the opportunity to continue the conversation. If you are interested in doing so, please reach out to Michelle Mulcahy at mmulcahy@devoted.com.

Explore other reviews about Devoted Health

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Welcoming and kind employee culture -Support and strong project feedback -Clear communication -Employees believe and support the mission of the company -Enthusiastic, talented, and passionate leaders

Cons

- There are two office spaces for hybrid work- they are great facilities but there are only two

3.0
Mar 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission to serve Medicare members well was clear, and the early culture reflected that. Teams were empowered, different leadership styles were welcomed, and people were trusted to solve problems in practical ways. There are still many talented and mission-driven people at the company who care deeply about the work and about members.

Cons

As the company grew rapidly, the culture began to change. Metrics have always been a focus, which is understandable in a performance-driven environment, but the emphasis increasingly shifted toward tracking activity and “effort” rather than measuring meaningful outcomes. Smaller assignments that once would have been handled with flexibility began to receive disproportionate attention, creating an environment that often felt more micromanaged than empowered. At the same time, accountability did not always appear to be applied consistently across leadership levels, which can be frustrating for teams that are being held to strict standards themselves. Frequent performance framework changes and constant iterations also created confusion and fatigue on the ground. In several cases, supervisor turnover concentrated under the same leadership should have been treated as a signal worth examining. Overall morale in parts of the organization has noticeably declined compared to earlier years.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All