Healthy Culture and Challenging Work - Manager Devoted Health Employee Review

5.0
Feb 13, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Devoted has a great culture within the organization, everyone treats each other with kindness and it really feels like everyone is dedicated to the mission of the organization and helping seniors. I feel challenged within my role and feel like the work I am doing is making a positive impact on members and the organization. My leader is very open-minded and encouraging of growing within the organization. The executive leadership is willing to get into the weeds with their teams and help lead them to solutions of complex issues.

Cons

No substantial cons. Adjusting to 100% remote work can definitely be a shift and was an adjustment period for me. Sometimes I miss the camaraderie of working in an office with coworkers, but overall the pros and flexibility of remote work far outweigh the cons.

Explore other reviews about Devoted Health

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Welcoming and kind employee culture -Support and strong project feedback -Clear communication -Employees believe and support the mission of the company -Enthusiastic, talented, and passionate leaders

Cons

- There are two office spaces for hybrid work- they are great facilities but there are only two

3.0
Mar 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission to serve Medicare members well was clear, and the early culture reflected that. Teams were empowered, different leadership styles were welcomed, and people were trusted to solve problems in practical ways. There are still many talented and mission-driven people at the company who care deeply about the work and about members.

Cons

As the company grew rapidly, the culture began to change. Metrics have always been a focus, which is understandable in a performance-driven environment, but the emphasis increasingly shifted toward tracking activity and “effort” rather than measuring meaningful outcomes. Smaller assignments that once would have been handled with flexibility began to receive disproportionate attention, creating an environment that often felt more micromanaged than empowered. At the same time, accountability did not always appear to be applied consistently across leadership levels, which can be frustrating for teams that are being held to strict standards themselves. Frequent performance framework changes and constant iterations also created confusion and fatigue on the ground. In several cases, supervisor turnover concentrated under the same leadership should have been treated as a signal worth examining. Overall morale in parts of the organization has noticeably declined compared to earlier years.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All