Incredibly Depressing Place To Work - Aononymous Devoted Health Employee Review

1.0
Aug 7, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Your coworkers are fabulous, intelligent people. Remote work.

Cons

Unfortunately, this company has been run into the ground by ineffective middle management and overly complicated workflows that generate more bureaucracy than actual results. The executive team and entry-level employees are strong, but the middle management tier (largely made up of early hires) often lacks formal qualifications and demonstrates poor grammar and emotional maturity. Leadership direction is like a fifth grader’s group chat run through AI for “professional tone”. More concerning than the lack of eduction is management inability to create meaningful, lean solutions to nagging problems. This affects the health and wellbeing of members far more than anyone is willing to admit. I would recommend people stay far away from this company as an employee and as a Medicare beneficiary.

avatar
Devoted Health Response
10mo
Thank you for sharing your perspective. We are glad to hear that you enjoy the remote nature of your role and that you feel your coworkers are fabulous people. Working with incredible people is an important part of being happy and inspired at work. We are sorry to hear that you have concerns with middle management. We would be happy to continue this dialogue with you to understand more about your feedback. Please reach out to people@devoted.com or lbrunner@devoted.com.

Explore other reviews about Devoted Health

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Welcoming and kind employee culture -Support and strong project feedback -Clear communication -Employees believe and support the mission of the company -Enthusiastic, talented, and passionate leaders

Cons

- There are two office spaces for hybrid work- they are great facilities but there are only two

3.0
Mar 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission to serve Medicare members well was clear, and the early culture reflected that. Teams were empowered, different leadership styles were welcomed, and people were trusted to solve problems in practical ways. There are still many talented and mission-driven people at the company who care deeply about the work and about members.

Cons

As the company grew rapidly, the culture began to change. Metrics have always been a focus, which is understandable in a performance-driven environment, but the emphasis increasingly shifted toward tracking activity and “effort” rather than measuring meaningful outcomes. Smaller assignments that once would have been handled with flexibility began to receive disproportionate attention, creating an environment that often felt more micromanaged than empowered. At the same time, accountability did not always appear to be applied consistently across leadership levels, which can be frustrating for teams that are being held to strict standards themselves. Frequent performance framework changes and constant iterations also created confusion and fatigue on the ground. In several cases, supervisor turnover concentrated under the same leadership should have been treated as a signal worth examining. Overall morale in parts of the organization has noticeably declined compared to earlier years.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All