The "30 year old start-up" - Engineer Dot Hill Employee Review

2.0
Dec 22, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Compensation is good, the people are nice, and office politics are minimal. The environment is very open and, as long as it's on your own time, there are resources for research and development with little interference from management. There are plenty of bright people who've carved out a niche (or silo) and been with the company for decades.

Cons

Product development is disorganized. It gets no support from middle management, and only reluctant recognition as a necessary evil from upper management. With no guidance, comes no coordination, no discipline, and no quality. Some teams are many times larger than needed because this produces so many bugs. Middle management myopically uses bug fixes as the sole measure of engineering productivity. Perversely, there is no perceived up side to producing fewer bugs.

Explore other reviews about Dot Hill

5.0
Apr 4, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Dot Hill offered a great intern experience and provided work in a very broad range of topics. My boss was very responsive and helpful. Every employee I worked with loved their job. There was also a great sense of community.

Cons

I can't say I ran into any cons during my time at Dot Hill. I could not have hoped for a better intern experience.

3.0
Feb 20, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good products, good people. I mean you would like to work there but it is an OK company. They are in to OEM business and thus the probability of failure is quite less. They were once, for a few years, not making profit, employees had pay cuts but they managed to get back up and making a profitable company.

Cons

Products are good from HW and architecture perspective but SW implementation is weak in my opinion. They do not have a good testing system and thus are scared to make changes to ensure a quality SW stack. Products fail for stupid reasons at customer's site! Customers find basic flaw in how some information is presented! They do not do something that is technically right until a customer makes a request! The modules that I have looked at is what I call the patchy-patch code i.e. the type of code where number of limited nature fixes keep growing and a couple of years down the line one can't make sense of a few parts of the code. Requirements document don't exist, sometimes they are made after the fact! Some managers micro-manage which even irritates colleagues from other departments. Some employees are not empowered and they do not learn anything outside of their box. And due to a bit antique SW mentality of some seniors, some new/junior employees even forget what they knew :) To summarize, one can't call the SW group awesome, it is just another OK group. It is neither good nor bad, just OK.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All