Some incredible people misdirected and mismanaged - UX Professional Dragos Employee Review

2.0
Jul 19, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I could tackle this a dozen ways. I’ll start with the punchline: My director was required to formally apologize to me on a call after an investigation by HR. It was the same call, with the director still on, that I was notified I was being let go because there had been irrevocable harm done to the working relationship between my director and me. My director suddenly, literally all in one day, introduced critiques and performance corrections into our weekly check-ins. There had been some “tweak your approach on this” before, certainly. But never a missed deliverable or an under-delivery. (Also never a deadline that I didn’t beat by days.) But these were unique for their being evaluations of work not assigned to me and work not assigned to anyone. Within a few weeks I formally requested HR’s evaluation of things. Tricky business building a case of “this new, critically evaluated deliverable that I didn’t deliver is not an industry standard anywhere — what I delivered was what the director requested and was content with until now.” (Stuff from months prior was suddenly being critically addressed, I assume to add gravity and longevity to the case being built against me.) The difficulty was made easier, however, by the emails and Slack messages explicitly communicating “this is exactly what I was looking for, thank you!” The three weeks of the investigation I genuinely was attempting to fill in any gaps that I might have had and hadn’t been aware of. I communicated with teammates discreetly. It was a teammate that pointed out that the director had felt that they should be the only person addressing strategic UX needs for Dragos. I hadn’t realized I had stepped on toes whatsoever. The scenario felt a little clearer after that. The director had been on a two week honeymoon and in the meantime I’d had extra time to work on “strategic projects.” We’d previously been encouraged to keep a 2/3rds tactical and 1/3rd strategic load. The CTO had asked questions that pertains to the strategic work so I had brought up the project. I’d stated I would prioritize the UX departments priorities, as determined by the director, but that if the CTO would like I could get the strategic work into first drafts pretty quickly. I was excited about the work, of course, and I was aware that if I did well that I would be positively positioned organizationally, of course. (I’m making obvious statements because I’m not going to pretend that I wasn’t trying to impress leadership. I also genuinely take seriously respecting the integrity of command chains and I will never allow myself to slack on departmental deliverables to pursue acclaim. I was delivering on both.) A week after the conversation in-which the teammate illuminate that I’d apparently caused the UX Director to feel threatened by my strategic work, the UX Director presented a near identical design ops strategy to the one I’d been working on. They are least equally addressed the need and were equally feasible. The next two weeks went by with much ado about nothing and finally I was informed that HR wanted to meet, if it was convenient. Immediate alarm, because the entire environment felt out of ordinary by then. I felt relieved though when the HR head began with, “We would like [the director] to apologize to you. We do believe that many of your assertions were warranted.” So, it felt otherworldly when I was informed I was being let go two sentences after the director’s apology. That was all about a year ago. I was laid off about a month before the tech layoffs began in earnest. I had great interviews out of the gate, then I was lost in the shuffle for awhile. Hit some interview records for my friend group though, 73 interviews across dozens of businesses. Made it to final interviews seven times, three eventually got back to me that the role was actually not going to be hired for after all. Two communicated that I was their second pick but I’d been beat out by someone with 8+ years experience for jobs listed as requiring 4+. (I’m arguably only now at 5. 6+ if you count long stretches of freelancing relevant work, though not only explicitly UX.) I only received one offer and took it. Better title, $5k pay cut. The out-of-work stage lasted nearly 7 months. I was legitimately working at an Amazon warehouse just to keep from bleeding quite as fast, financially. (Custody battle, etc, general living expenses, etc. Five Hail Marys, amen.) Loved many of the people that worked there. Was gutted to see the layoffs recently. The Product department is a mess, UX inherited the mess, dev gets stacked with tech debt and they attempt to battle it with an army of engineers and developers. The CTO has no experience leading a product, (quite literally), and I think there’s maybe one of ten product managers who has product experience. (They’re all some form of domain expert in OT or ICS.) It was an absolute mess. It just happened to have some of the smartest people I’ve met strung throughout the organization, trying to duct tape it all together. Steer clear. Heavily consider hiring former employees from Dragos.

Cons

First time founders, under prepared, in over their heads, experts in OT/ICS security and not in product development, road mapping, or data informed decision making. Shockingly horrific UX Director, if they’re still employed. Happily disconnected with them on LinkedIn and haven’t looked them up once.

Explore other reviews about Dragos

5.0
Jul 20, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Dragos offers a very specific and unique mission that allows one to contribute ot have more visibility to your work compared to getting buried in a larger or more general organization. In general, great and helpful teams which are well aligned. Definitely retains is smaller startup type vibe in comparison to massive tech orgs. Recent Accenture news has certainly energized many efforts and reduced uncertainty or doubt both internally and externally. Definitely a sense of “hitting stride” and its a great time to be here.

Cons

Not immune to typical corporate problems such as politics or changes in company or product direction. Much of that is in the past or a result of prior leadership. With recent news and current direction, many of the previously mentioned negatives have been removed. There is a very specific focus for the company and that may be too niche for some. Dragos is entirely remote and generally requires a bit of autonomy to your role, may not be the best for junior positions or those more accustomed to an office environment.

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Dragos’ mission is unparalleled. You get to work on some of the hardest problems, turning abstract ideas into technical solutions. The solutions directly benefit millions of people who rely on power, clean water, and food. The company is very focused on this mission. This focus stems from Rob himself. Not once in five years has he wavered from this focus. For some people, it’s just a job. But for Rob, it’s a cause. This intense commitment to keeping civilization safe can be off-putting for those who view the company and mission as just another temporary stepping stone up the career ladder. If one is willing to work hard, seek to maximize the value that they offer for this mission, and work with a sense of urgency, then there is a place for them at Dragos. I’ll close with this: Dragos employees work from home, earn in the top percentiles relative to all other workers in the USA, serve a mission that was more important than any one person, and receive amazing benefits. Yet, despite this, some former employees complain. I personally believe some of those people lacked perspective maybe the whole time they were at Dragos. It’s easy to be a critic. It’s a lot harder to keep focus on such a fundamental mission for over a decade while building a company and fighting off malicious adversaries. People need to keep that in mind.

Cons

Honestly I can’t think of anything. People have to be truly out of touch with reality in America to find fault.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All