Admissions, Manassas campus - Admissions Advisor ECPI University Employee Review

1.0
Jun 10, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They pay you. Dave (the assistant director of admissions- the only one there who knows how to manage people), and the occasional awesome student.

Cons

Minimum of 80 phone calls a day- They call it admissions, but its a call center. Then you spend 45 minutes getting to know someone so you can sell them an unaccredited program that will put them 50K in debt (the RN program). It's impossible to do your job and sleep at night. Morals aside, the hours that this company asks you to keep completely destroys any semblance of a work/life balance. You will work every other Saturday, christmas eve, labor day, new years eve, the night before Thanksgiving (until 9 PM, might I add). Every week you have two late days and two early days so you wont have a consistent sleep schedule either. Working till 9 PM and then being at work at 8 AM the next day takes a toll on your body. I have not a single nice thing to say about the medical director of admissions, Jason. The technical DOA, Mike, has a good heart, which almost makes the daily harassment acceptable. Almost. No bonuses, awful health insurance, highest raise they gave out this year was 2%.

Explore other reviews about ECPI University

5.0
May 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hands on experience and wide range of technologies to learn about

Cons

Starting pay a bit low

1.0
Jun 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Select coworkers and departmental peers were fantastic to work with, highly collaborative, resilient, and dedicated professionals doing their best under difficult circumstances. The core mission of supporting adult learners is incredibly fulfilling.

Cons

The organizational culture at corporate headquarters is highly political and intensely protective of the status quo. There is a pervasive tendency among long-term staff to actively resist modernization or the adoption of standard industry practices. Outdated, inefficient processes are deliberately preserved to safeguard individual roles, even when those workflows directly degrade the student experience. Furthermore, executive leadership focuses heavily on internal politics, insular dynamics, and hyper-monitoring granular KPIs rather than student outcomes. This has created a highly reactive and psychologically unsafe environment characterized by a systemic rejection of external expertise. Outside talent recruited to modernize operations is regularly alienated, targeted, or terminated if they do not completely file and rank within the insular corporate hierarchy. Talented professionals who champion necessary compliance or operational updates face retaliatory pushback from senior management, resulting in a notably high turnover rate among external hires. Compensation is also far less competitive for the level of administrative strain expected.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All