Not the Worst Job You'll Ever Have, But Move Along. - Faculty ECPI University Employee Review

3.0
Dec 3, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It's not all bad. If you're firm, willing to take on additional responsibility, and know your value (and have the right Campus President), you can earn a reasonable salary . Some of the students are really great people. I was particularly fond of the working adults who came back to school to pick up a tech skill set and knew EXACTLY what they wanted to do. For those students, the degree was arguably worth the cost of tuition. Some of the faculty and staff members are lovely people who put students first and believe in what they do. Perks vary across campuses. In some locations, vacation time is flexible, as are schedules generally. In others, seemingly arbitrary rules dictate everything from "timeclocks" and lunch breaks to vacation schedules. If you keep your students happy, you can mostly fly under the radar. That's not to say you can or should get away with slacking, just that the primary administrative concern is pass rate/ student body totals. Keep students in seats and you'll stay out of trouble. I guess that's a pro.

Cons

There is no policy on salary increases and a wide range of salaries, even within similar positions on the same campus, creating quite a bit of frustration. This is not a school that puts students first, nor is any For-Profit institution. (Having said that, please see the "pros" I've shared, as there are some real benefits for certain students who attend this school.) Campus Presidents make local policy and are wholly responsible for HR, academic, and administrative decisions, so some campuses enjoy a general sense of community and are relatively happy places, and some are miserable hellholes. There is NO opportunity for advancement beyond Department Chair (called "Program Director" for some reason), no tenure, and absolutely no job security. Teach at ECPI to learn how to really do it from the trenches: you haven't taught a college course until you've taught one for 5 hours with very little supplemental material and students who have been conned into attending by a dishonest and unethical team of "Admissions" staff. Which brings me to the school's penultimate problem: admissions. The bar for admission to ECPI is so low that the school regularly admits non-english speakers, students with severely disruptive behavioral problems, and optimistic illiterates. Does everyone deserve a chance at higher education? Perhaps. But rest assured that these students aren't admitted on the basis of such lofty ideals. They're admitted because the school's compressed schedule (0 to Bachelors in 2.5, right?) allows students to BORROW INSANE AMOUNTS OF MONEY BEFORE INEVITABLY FAILING TO MEET SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS STANDARDS, RESULTING IN FEDERALLY MANDATED SUSPENSION. So yeah, you can teach here and do okay, for a little while. Folks are mostly nice, some of the students are great, and the money sure beats the hell out of adjunct pay at a local University or CC. But good luck sleeping at night.

Explore other reviews about ECPI University

5.0
May 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hands on experience and wide range of technologies to learn about

Cons

Starting pay a bit low

1.0
Jun 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Select coworkers and departmental peers were fantastic to work with, highly collaborative, resilient, and dedicated professionals doing their best under difficult circumstances. The core mission of supporting adult learners is incredibly fulfilling.

Cons

The organizational culture at corporate headquarters is highly political and intensely protective of the status quo. There is a pervasive tendency among long-term staff to actively resist modernization or the adoption of standard industry practices. Outdated, inefficient processes are deliberately preserved to safeguard individual roles, even when those workflows directly degrade the student experience. Furthermore, executive leadership focuses heavily on internal politics, insular dynamics, and hyper-monitoring granular KPIs rather than student outcomes. This has created a highly reactive and psychologically unsafe environment characterized by a systemic rejection of external expertise. Outside talent recruited to modernize operations is regularly alienated, targeted, or terminated if they do not completely file and rank within the insular corporate hierarchy. Talented professionals who champion necessary compliance or operational updates face retaliatory pushback from senior management, resulting in a notably high turnover rate among external hires. Compensation is also far less competitive for the level of administrative strain expected.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All