STEER CLEAR - Faculty ECPI University Employee Review

1.0
Dec 31, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are no pros to this organization.

Cons

Profits over education EVERY TIME!!!!!! Lack of leadership and poor management throughout the entire organization! Predatory business practices. Veterans BEWARE, the school only cares about getting your GI bill! Unorganized and short-staffed! They are always short-staffed, and they drag their feet to hire anyone so they can save money on paying salaries and benefits; therefore, you will always be overworked and underpaid! Policies and procedures are situational and individualized. Basically, any "rule" and even grade can be changed to ensure the university is making money. PTO policy does not benefit the staff, it benefits the university! Staff must use their PTO when the university is closed which leaves them with little to no PTO to use throughout the school year. Don't get sick or let LIFE happen because you won't have any PTO to use. The favoritism for certain elite employees is palpable! Some people can do no wrong while others can do no right! No training! You will basically be thrown into your job and will be required to figure it out as you go!

Explore other reviews about ECPI University

5.0
May 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hands on experience and wide range of technologies to learn about

Cons

Starting pay a bit low

1.0
Jun 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Select coworkers and departmental peers were fantastic to work with, highly collaborative, resilient, and dedicated professionals doing their best under difficult circumstances. The core mission of supporting adult learners is incredibly fulfilling.

Cons

The organizational culture at corporate headquarters is highly political and intensely protective of the status quo. There is a pervasive tendency among long-term staff to actively resist modernization or the adoption of standard industry practices. Outdated, inefficient processes are deliberately preserved to safeguard individual roles, even when those workflows directly degrade the student experience. Furthermore, executive leadership focuses heavily on internal politics, insular dynamics, and hyper-monitoring granular KPIs rather than student outcomes. This has created a highly reactive and psychologically unsafe environment characterized by a systemic rejection of external expertise. Outside talent recruited to modernize operations is regularly alienated, targeted, or terminated if they do not completely file and rank within the insular corporate hierarchy. Talented professionals who champion necessary compliance or operational updates face retaliatory pushback from senior management, resulting in a notably high turnover rate among external hires. Compensation is also far less competitive for the level of administrative strain expected.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All