Great teammates - Institutional Research Coordinator ECPI University Employee Review

4.0
Sep 17, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people, reasonable hours, remote work

Cons

Low pay, company doesn't care about employees.

avatar
ECPI University Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts about your experience at ECPI. We appreciate your feedback, and we are glad that you've found our team to be great to work with. You also shared concerns about pay and the perception that the university does not care about its employees. We take these matters seriously and are continuously evaluating employee pay to make sure it is competitive within the marketplace. We also strive to create a positive and supportive work environment for all team members. We encourage you to reach out to HR with any specific concerns so that we can address them directly: ECPITalentAcq@ecpi.edu. We value your contributions to ECPI and look forward to continuing to work with you.

Explore other reviews about ECPI University

5.0
May 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hands on experience and wide range of technologies to learn about

Cons

Starting pay a bit low

1.0
Jun 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Select coworkers and departmental peers were fantastic to work with, highly collaborative, resilient, and dedicated professionals doing their best under difficult circumstances. The core mission of supporting adult learners is incredibly fulfilling.

Cons

The organizational culture at corporate headquarters is highly political and intensely protective of the status quo. There is a pervasive tendency among long-term staff to actively resist modernization or the adoption of standard industry practices. Outdated, inefficient processes are deliberately preserved to safeguard individual roles, even when those workflows directly degrade the student experience. Furthermore, executive leadership focuses heavily on internal politics, insular dynamics, and hyper-monitoring granular KPIs rather than student outcomes. This has created a highly reactive and psychologically unsafe environment characterized by a systemic rejection of external expertise. Outside talent recruited to modernize operations is regularly alienated, targeted, or terminated if they do not completely file and rank within the insular corporate hierarchy. Talented professionals who champion necessary compliance or operational updates face retaliatory pushback from senior management, resulting in a notably high turnover rate among external hires. Compensation is also far less competitive for the level of administrative strain expected.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All