employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Early Warning Services

Engaged Employer

This is not an organization a true professional wants to work in. - Anonymous employee Early Warning Services Employee Review

1.0
Jul 25, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is a great deal of lip service. Core values are just that. On paper. But take heart to the lip service - It makes you feel good temporarily unless you're smart enough to understand the politics of the company. Be smart, smile and thank them. Work here long enough and you'll understand the "pros" of the company. They've worked here over 10 years. They are also your cons. Keep your head low and you'll gradually reach a level of apathy - kind of like Payton place. Smile and go about your business. Great place to realize where not to be.

Cons

Watch out. I've been here over 2 years and am resigning tomorrow. Been looking for my next gig after 6 months being here. For a company that is support the banking applications of 5 major owner banks, there is much to be 'concerned about'. Ooops are swept under the rug. Bring ideas forward and they are embraced but then you hear about how you 'challenged' the strategy. It's a land mine of politics. If you want to be here, take a position that keeps you OUT of having a voice. This company is a disaster and one major breach is headed it's way. Employee beware

Explore other reviews about Early Warning Services

5.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Really solid company. Good high level leadership and the best culture ive seen. Runs like a start up so lots of opportunity for impact. Growth is everywhere and theyre supportive of continuing ed. Culture varies by LOB. I work in Paze and cannot speak to Zelle or Certos.

Cons

This is silly but I cannot stand the work laptops. Small little windows machines.

1.0
May 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly coworkers, interesting problem space if you like finance and big data. In-office requirements but many show up after 10 or leave before 3.

Cons

Around the time of my exit, two people in leadership were fired. In my professional career I've never witnessed a firing that felt more like a humiliation ritual. They were paraded around the office and through all-hands meetings to aid transition (presumably for a new VP installing their replacement of choice), with my direct leads acting incredibly two-faced. Wishing condolences to the faces of the newly departed, but celebrating behind closed doors. Really gross. This behavior would at least make sense if it were in service of a good technical vision, but in my ten years of experience I have truly never seen worse development standards. Rampant ego and inertia. Getting engineers to even use Git is like pulling teeth. Want to install Python 3.10.x instead of Python 3.11.x? Have fun waiting 2 months for approval. And the communication from the executive level is nausea-inducing. Rarely we hear anything that strikes at the core of these issues. Rather it is vapid platitude after platitude. And insistence on the adoption of core values that feel like a Temu version of Amazon LPs.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All