Hunger Games played out in real life - Manager Elanco Employee Review

3.0
Jan 12, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Growing company (through acquisition rather than organic growth) in a growing industry, animal health, so possibly opportunities for development. Diverse job opportunities: sales and marketing, manufacturing, R&D - something for everybody. Great projects and products.

Cons

Hasn't handled recent large acquisitions well,with seriously negative effects on culture, morale, retention. Despite recent global acquisitions, they remain very US-centric - foreign markets don't get adequate materials or budget to deliver customer needs. They don't "walk the talk" with regards to their corporate values - they say one thing but don't put it into practice. Rolling acquisitions have resulted in rolling retrenchments - poor employment security since 2014. The outlook is for more uncertainty. They handle the retrenchment process poorly. Communication and transparency is appalling. Be warned: you're likely to discover your imminent retrenchment in the industry press rather than from your manager. Very high expectations - the last few years of my job were high stress and long hours for little acknowledgement and inadequate salary.

Explore other reviews about Elanco

5.0
May 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Management listens to their emoloyees. Great benefits.

Cons

Old equipment. Lots of forced ot for hourly employees

avatar
Elanco Response
1w
We appreciate your positive feedback regarding management and benefits. At Elanco, we are dedicated to the wellbeing of our employees and are always looking for opportunities for improvement - we thank you for your feedback!
2.0
Feb 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Cons

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All