Good place to work but a little disorganized at times - Business Process Manager Elanco Employee Review

4.0
Aug 23, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People tend to be very passionate especially about animals. Very diverse workforce from around the world.

Cons

There seems to be a lot of disorganization. Elanco relies heavily on 3rd party support to run major projects and sometimes the different 3rd parties do not work well together.

avatar
Elanco Response
3y
Thank you for your feedback and advice to management. We do agree – we are a global enterprise of people with passion! We know that the work we do to make life better for animals, makes life better. We will pass it on your comments and encourage you to speak with your supervisor about your advice as well.

Explore other reviews about Elanco

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Treats interns well by providing PTO during the summer shut down

Cons

Didn't really have any issues with the internship.

2.0
Feb 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Cons

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All