Engineer - Engineer At ANO Entergy Employee Review

1.0
Mar 15, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I get to work with some of the best individuals I have ever met. If it was not for the co-workers both in my department and those departments which I support frequently, I would not be able function in my job role. Decent pay but not sufficient for the frequent call-outs, expected overtime, and extreme stress caused by this job.

Cons

All Engineering Management above supervisors is horrible and some supervisors also however at the supervisor level is is the exception not the rule. There is insufficient engineers to complete the workload, some disciplines are still at staffing levels approved by HCM with plans to hire one more person. The continued use of low cost engineering contractors will result in extreme cost to recover the design basis or permanent shut of the Units. Most Design Engineers only manage contracts and review the products, hardly ever getting to write the modification. Most experienced personnel have retired or quit without providing any knowledge transfer. Since little to no knowledge transfer has occurred new individuals are providing Owners Acceptance Reviews for products that they cannot even write (Note: they are qualified but not experienced enough), how can an engineer review a product if they do not even know what it takes to properly perform the modification. Accountability is only held at the individual contributor and supervisor level. Mangers routinely block individuals from even being able to be interviewed by other departments. Some of the newer supervisors (both promotions and new hires) have lost a sense of reality; I understand they are trying to make the site better but they are alienating their employees. Currently the site changes the slogans every few months to align with some new goal that has been set, due to the repeated changes most individuals just ignore what comes out unless they get called for a meeting with management or outside agencies then just grab whatever flyers are up to take with them. Becoming an in-house engineer is a stupid mistake, contractors have same or better benefits, much better pay, getting paid for every hour worked, no accountability, lower standards for work being approved, and do not have to routine on-call time. Management has been known to signature shop when something does not meet the assigned engineers standards.

Explore other reviews about Entergy

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good company to work for

Cons

Dumb management ignorant people but that’s anywhere

2.0
Jun 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, generous bonus program Health insurance is pretty good Profit sharing contribution to retirement every year in addition to regular 401k match Strong financial outlook for the company

Cons

Over reliance on vendors/contractors. Over the years, IT leadership has outsourced so much of our technical knowledge to where vendors can extort us for any dollar amount. Even my own team is not immune from this. I always have to deal with vendors to do most work on the applications that our team is responsible for. I have a lot of knowledge about our applications and how Entergy uses them but I always feel like I have one hand tied behind my back dealing with the vendors. They've been redoing all of their project startup and PMO processes with a consulting firm over the last few months and it's going terribly. I've attended all of the trainings and the information that they've provided gives us no guidance on what we're supposed to do and how we're supposed to do it. The consultants that do this training name drop the CIO all the time during the trainings and working sessions almost like it's a threat (apparently the owner of the consulting firm and the CIO are old friends). I asked my manager if we could just use the old process since we already knew it but was told that we could not. It kind of feels like they're going to outsource the project managers and the PMO again just like it was years ago when I first started here, so that'll be one more thing that we're stuck with dealing with a vendor on. The company has a lot of really good growth potential right now with all the data center work happening in our region, so maybe this has something to do with this, but it seems like IT is constantly doing re-orgs. I've been lucky to have not been too directly affected by them other than our group reporting to a different VP, but a lot of my friends on other teams feel like they're constantly getting passed around and a lot of people are starting to question whether the CIO and his lead team actually know what they're doing. They introduced an initiative earlier this year for all of us to come up with ideas for ways to cut down on hours of labor using AI. The leadership team is framing it as a way for us to free up time to work on other things, but with all of the news about companies laying people off because of AI, most of my teammates assume that these efforts are setting the stage for them to do that to us too. Teams often feel like we're working against each other and not with each other. The team I'm on gets along great, but there is constant finger pointing between application teams, infrastructure teams, networking teams, security teams, project managers, etc. And the sad thing is that the managers, senior managers, and directors are the worst at it. They do a horrible job of leading by example.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All