Software Development Engineer - Software Development Engineer Expedia Group Employee Review

3.0
Apr 25, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Overall work-life balance is great with flexible work hours and schedules but this can be team dependent - Generally very friendly and nice people with a mostly relaxed and laid-back work environment - Decent benefits including travel and wellness reimbursement, travel discounts, standard 401k matching, good vacation policy, healthcare, and matching charitable donations - "Test and Learn" culture makes data the main driving force for product decisions

Cons

- Generally poor middle management and heavy politics at management levels - Some engineering teams have bad ratios of technical product managers/engineering managers to developers that create too much overhead and slow initiatives down - Very unclear promotion paths and requirements. This causes a clash between the diversity initiatives and the meritocracy that the company preaches and can lead to a sentiment of unfairness during promotion cycles. - Overall average engineering quality with some exceptions. Unable to maintain solid talent from leaving to other companies in the area (seems like Amazon is becoming a top destination) - Expedia advertises itself as a tech company, but the culture of average compensation makes the company lag behind tech companies in the area. - Constantly playing catch-up to competitors which creates less opportunities to pursue features that innovate or distinguish Expedia in the market - Some product decisions feel short-sighted. Just because the conversion numbers are good does not mean it is good in the long run.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
Dec 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

work life balance is chill, benefits are great, work can be rewarding

Cons

not as challenging, more of a coaster company, pay not as high

2.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Cons

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All