Not a bad place to work in some ways, probably not the best for software engineers - Java Developer Expeditors Employee Review

2.0
Apr 4, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Low administrative overhead, excellent medical benefits, generally strong upper management, minimal overtime, not a lot of micromanagement depending on the team

Cons

Very low salary compared to market, lack of schedule flexibility, minimal sick time, lack of HR department means that accurate benefits information isn't always provided, training and expectations highly variable depending on team, stable but boring technologies (except when someone decides to swap out a bunch of architecture and you end up rewriting an application), massive disconnect between business and IT

Explore other reviews about Expeditors

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good environment employee engagement good industry experince

Cons

higher pay would be good but good benefits and time off

2.0
Jul 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Stability and job security, formerly. Compressed work weeks and work-life balance, formerly. A 47-year no-layoff policy tested in two recessions and a pandemic. Formerly. Now? Well, all of those are gone, so it's hard to really cite anything other than that there's health care and the paychecks don't bounce.

Cons

The same stuff that's always been there, for one. Strict dress code. Dated systems they're trying to run away from as fast as humanly possible. Strict in-office culture with limited WFH. Little to no upward mobility; most senior management has been there for 20+ years and when someone does get promoted, the remaining jobs often seem to magically go to their buddies without getting bid. A complete inability to manage and coordinate anything effectively amongst multiple teams, which apparently is going to be somehow solved by laying off almost all the project/program managers. Oh, and on top of all that? Now, the new regime will lay you off, but first they'll gaslight you and claim the no-layoff policy never existed. Then they'll claim the team managers (who they conveniently also laid off) did the rankings that determined who got cut. Then they'll put a bunch of the survivors into a "bootcamp" and then make them interview to keep their jobs.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All