Hubris and The Hunger Games (Seattle Branch) - Anonymous employee Expeditors Employee Review

1.0
Aug 8, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very easy to get hired.

Cons

Literally everything. This is a culture that refuses to change. 99% of all the employees start and end their careers at Expeditors which is good and bad. This means there is no outside influence and it’s almost like a bubble. No one has any idea what businesses outside of Expeditors are accomplishing or capable of and refuse to entertain any idea for change or improvement. The branch culture of this organization breeds competition to the detriment of customers. The only way I can articulate culture at Expeditors is to refer to “The Hunger Games.” You have the Capital (referred to internally as CHQ, or the corporate headquarters downtown Seattle). Each branch is like one of the Capital’s districts - they are their own profit centers and CHQ takes 50% of their profit for “support.” Its hard to identify what “support” they give the branches as technology is so old and out of date you’ll be managing work in Excel. Now, to make this comparison even better, there is a “Branch of the Year” competition. This is where branches compete with one another on pointless metrics in order to win a trophy for “Branch of the Year.” Much of your work will be dictated by these metrics which serve no larger purpose to the customer. It is a vain attempt from CHQ to establish global consistencies which are impossible to accomplish with the current branch set up. Each branch has been independently operated for 40 years so all processes, titles, pay, responsibilities, technology used, etc... determined by the branch and not CHQ. Managers are incompetent or have zero experience. The essential downfall of this organization will be that all good talent capable of leaving will leave. Whoever is left is who is promoted and you’re left with a significant drain. A constant revolving door except now no one wants to go back in this building. Inevitably it will cease turning at some point. Expect to be paid less than an Amazon delivery driver. Expect your overtime and contributions to fluctuate at the whim of one individual. Expect to have no perks at all. The building is literally falling apart. During our safety inspection it was found our fire extinguishers were expired. The ceiling poured water recently. The HVAC system has not been cleaned in 40 years (the lifespan of this company). The legal displays in the break room are COMPLETELY OUT OF DATE (illegal) and show Washington State minimum wage to be $10.60 (its currently $12.00) which gives you an idea of how little attention they pay to the environment. You’ll also need to bring your own silverware/plates if you want to eat. There is no public transport nor anything near the office (as in no food joints to walk to). Employee morale is at an all time low. In the almost 1 year I spent here there has been so much turnover I’ve lost count. It’s really depressing, folks. It’s like a cocktail party here; it’s about who you know/are related to that allows you advancement.

Explore other reviews about Expeditors

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good environment employee engagement good industry experince

Cons

higher pay would be good but good benefits and time off

2.0
Jul 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Stability and job security, formerly. Compressed work weeks and work-life balance, formerly. A 47-year no-layoff policy tested in two recessions and a pandemic. Formerly. Now? Well, all of those are gone, so it's hard to really cite anything other than that there's health care and the paychecks don't bounce.

Cons

The same stuff that's always been there, for one. Strict dress code. Dated systems they're trying to run away from as fast as humanly possible. Strict in-office culture with limited WFH. Little to no upward mobility; most senior management has been there for 20+ years and when someone does get promoted, the remaining jobs often seem to magically go to their buddies without getting bid. A complete inability to manage and coordinate anything effectively amongst multiple teams, which apparently is going to be somehow solved by laying off almost all the project/program managers. Oh, and on top of all that? Now, the new regime will lay you off, but first they'll gaslight you and claim the no-layoff policy never existed. Then they'll claim the team managers (who they conveniently also laid off) did the rankings that determined who got cut. Then they'll put a bunch of the survivors into a "bootcamp" and then make them interview to keep their jobs.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All