employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

EyeCare Partners

Is this your company?

Needs work - Anonymous employee EyeCare Partners Employee Review

2.0
Dec 4, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are talented and caring individuals working at Eyecare partners, particularly in the clinics. There is a yearly vision benefit to use towards frames and lenses.

Cons

Many times the talented employees, already in place, are overlooked for new talent. The new talent makes decisions without the history and then leaves. This happens in a revolving pattern and leaves those on the ground level discouraged and left to deal with poor decisions made by those without prior company experience. The company cannot get traction on initiatives because of the constant turnover at the executive levels. This is in all area but felt the most in HR, RCM, and IT. There have been poor IT decisions made over the years that cause efficiency and workflow problems at all levels of the clinics. This is a systemic issue and not only related to one location or group. There is little trust in what ECP stands for. There are many examples across the company of run down buildings, outdated equipment, and major pay discrepancies among people in the same roles.

Explore other reviews about EyeCare Partners

5.0
Nov 3, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay and benefits. Management was there to help you succeed.

Cons

Calls could be back to back and repetitive.

1.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting projects, opportunity to support a business that services patients. Shared services is mostly remote.

Cons

Working for PE-backed firm stinks. Strategy fluctuates and changes with each Executive leadership turnover. Most of the senior leadership is filled with mercenaries who are here only for the next turn (sale) of the company, to cash in their equity options. Several were hired from RCA (a competitor) post RCA's sale. At the corporate level few/none are interested in building a good business, only in extracting what value they can to cash in and move to the next PE firm and repeat. In 3 years: - 3 CEOs - 3 CIOs - CHRO let go and not backfilled - CMO let go and not backfilled - 3 rounds of layoffs that I know of. Often people who were hired within 12 months. Saves money? Maybe except often they have to pay 3x for contractors to do the same work - but on the balance sheet it looks better to pay more for contractors due to EBITDA games.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All