Great people, bad tech - Full Stack Software Engineer Fannie Mae Employee Review

3.0
Apr 19, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People are friendly, positive, and focused on business material matters.

Cons

Software developers are second class citizens. The technology is awful. Due to frequent use of desktop-as-a-service, developers face daily operational problems like lag and environment issues. This is not considered a priority by managers. This problem is compounded by software misconfigs and inconsistent development environments. In addition, computers are completely locked down, so fixing OS misconfigs can be slow. Also, there is a lack of improvement mindset (with respect to code and software quality). Issues that could easily be fixed go unresolved because "the business" doesn't seem to care about anything outside of their narrow viewport, and developers just sorta follow along. Technical leadership does not exist in any material sense. Attempts come off as insincere.

Explore other reviews about Fannie Mae

5.0
May 25, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

benefits, pay, work life balance

Cons

no cons to be honest

3.0
Jul 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I had thought I’d stay there until retirement. Pay was pretty good and while upward mobility was limited there was an open environment for learning and getting involved in new things. The company was socially conscious with volunteer time available. Flex schedules were available with manager approval and that helped us effectively implement work from home in 2020. We did work a lot of long hours to get projects done but the work seemed to be appreciated and rewarded.

Cons

For a company that had been highly profitable, Bill Pulte came in and started demanding changes for the company to be run more like one on the verge of bankruptcy. Managers were forced to spend significant time managing attendance and schedules and constantly justifying staffing just to have that ignored anyway. Anybody below a Director was cut completely out of these decisions meaning managers would show up to meetings to find the no-shows had been let go with no warning. You just started to see on people’s faces they were miserable, many long time associates quietly hoping they’d be included in the next round of cuts. It’s too bad, a company I had thought I’d retire with really just became toxic.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All