Great employees, loyal customers - Financial Services Representative Flagstar Bank Employee Review

3.0
Oct 2, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I found most of the co workers to be helpful and great at working in a team environment. I found the (classroom) training to be useful for myself because I had never worked in a bank before. The computer system was user friendly, and the IT Dept. was always happy to help with any technical questions. Pay and benefits for a part time CSR were about right on with competitors.

Cons

I found serious security issues working in a branch by myself at times (at closing and opening). I believe some of these policies may have changed. There was never an armed security guard at the branch I worked at until our branch had a robbery. Sometimes sales goals were unrealistic depending on the foot traffic in a branch and other factors.

Explore other reviews about Flagstar Bank

5.0
Feb 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very knowledgeable and helpful people who are experts in enterprise systems

Cons

N/A during my time with the company

2.0
Mar 10, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits are decent. Average PTO

Cons

My experience with this company has been disappointing. Branch goals are unrealistic with no marketing or brand awareness to support the high goals and teams feel defeated. Senior leadership often communicates in a demeaning way, which has contributed to high turnover and declining morale. Despite emphasizing the importance of ‘hiring right,’ the President of Consumer Banking has cycled through three heads of Consumer Banking in just three years. The annual review process is long and drawn out (5 month process) and feels inconsistent and more like a popularity contest than a true evaluation of performance. Although the scale ranges from 1–5, employees are told that most ratings will fall in the 2–3 range, with 4s being rare and 5s essentially unattainable. The calibration process appears to focus more on filling predetermined rating quotas than assessing actual contributions. Employees are required to write their own reviews, which are then rewritten by leadership before being sent to HR for calibration. The final ratings often seem influenced more by internal politics than by merit. Annual increases are very minimal or zero. Overall, the environment lacks transparency, fairness, and genuine support for employee growth.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All