Pretty good - Clinical Research Associate II Fortrea Employee Review

4.0
Sep 14, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) Pay is better than most other CROs. 2) I personally had a good manager, and didn't hear many horror stories on managers compared to the other CROs I worked with. Also both direct manager and study teams actually RECOGNIZE you for the hard work you put in. 3) Use of National as the main car rental service.

Cons

1)Per diem policy is not as good as some other CROs (amount is higher, but you must use company card, can only buy certain things, extra time doing expense reports etc). 2) The $ limits and legwork on booking travel: if you go over some certain (not very large) amount you have to get study mgr approval which is an extra step in the already annoying Concur process which can lose you bookings or seat selections; the general poor choice of hotels allowed to be chosen in Concur vs. the other CROs. 3) inconsistency in study manager/project manager quality. Either they're extremely good or basically non-present, and complaints on the latter (e.g. I can't get approval for travel because this person never responds) basically are useless (though the managers do at least act sympathetic)

Explore other reviews about Fortrea

5.0
Oct 2, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people, good pay, good work life balance.

Cons

I can't think of any.

1.0
Jun 15, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In my experience, the greatest benefit of working here was the breadth of exposure I gained across my function. That said, much of it came out of necessity rather than design. Due to what I observed as persistent understaffing, high turnover, and recurring rounds of layoffs, I found myself taking on responsibilities that stretched well beyond any defined scope. If you're someone who learns by doing and can tolerate ambiguity, you will walk away having touched more than you would in a more stable environment. Benefits were adequate, though it was my experience that the company announced plans to eliminate dependent coverage starting in 2027, which was a meaningful shift for employees with families.

Cons

In my time here, I found role clarity to be nearly nonexistent. I went without a formal job description for the duration of my tenure, and despite raising it, leadership indicated for well over a year that it was being worked on. That pattern, in my opinion, reflected a broader cultural issue: change was frequent but poorly managed, and directional guidance from leadership felt inconsistent and at times difficult to trust. I personally felt that communication about the company's position and direction was not always straightforward. The organization also appeared, in my view, to default to workforce reductions as a primary business lever rather than investing in stabilization or accountability. When leadership gaps surfaced, my experience was that they were minimized rather than addressed directly. The culture within my dept was also something I struggled with. In my experience, there was significant misalignment around ownership and responsibility, and the dynamic felt more competitive than collaborative. Rather than pulling in the same direction, it often felt like individuals within the team worked against one another rather than in cooperation, which made an already challenging environment that much harder to navigate.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All