Running itself into the ground - Anonymous employee Franklin Energy Employee Review

1.0
Dec 12, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The CEO is a great person with a vision for sustainability

Cons

Company – The company head is a good person with a great head on his shoulders that had a lovely vision but with an unfortunate management team that has ruined the company reputation. The company overall has no real path on where they are headed. They have lofty goals for growth but no plan on how to get there. To simplify how things have been running, they apply for any RFP with any program, no matter what the program goal and profess the capability to complete it despite a complete lack of resources or technology to do so. Clients are often led to believe certain technology can be created, and then the managers work people to the bone to give the least expectations to the client because they don’t have the resources to deliver what they state. Management – Given the overall company dynamic of “throw everything at the wall and see what sticks,” the management team has taken to creating unattainable goals for their direct reports and criticizing them for working less than 60-hour weeks. Everyone is working on multiple projects instead of what they are hired on for and often have no expertise in the extra areas they end up overseeing. Management themselves is comprised of employees whose main bragging point is that they were hire no. XXX for the company and have been around long enough to rise without the background or know-how to run a program. HR – Given the complete lack of company foresight, HR has all but given up. Their only goal is to protect the company image wherever possible. They do not assist with any complaints coming up to them unless it comes from management. If someone is put on a corrective action or performance plan, none of the negative comments from the manager are reviewed by HR and are taken at face value. This has given many management employees run of the company to harass whomever they choose without any repercussions and no follow up by HR to protect anyone under them. There is also no promotion path for any role because they just dole out whatever title they need at the time for new positions.

avatar
Franklin Energy Response
7y
Thank you for taking time to share your thoughts with us. Our CEO and the entire management team takes input from our team very seriously and thinks that there are things you are pointing out where we can and need to improve. We agree that we have an opportunity to better communicate our vision with all employees throughout the organization and be more selective in the work we pursue. As with any growth company, the pace can be fast and workload heavy. Thus, we strongly encourage all employees to ensure they are achieving a good work/life balance through our wellness program and other initiatives. In regards to Human Resources, we strive to build a trusted partnership with every employee within our organization, and I’d like to discuss your concerns more if you are willing to reach out to HumanResources@FranklinEnergy.com.

Explore other reviews about Franklin Energy

5.0
Nov 6, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Growing company Helping the environment Helping clients, customers, contractors, and team members Flexible hours Remote work for many roles Teams where everyone feels a part Creative and extremely intelligent thought leaders and industry experts Jobs for every personality and skillset

Cons

Contracted work so things change from time to time

1.0
May 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Some talented people that are seriously trying * You can say you work in sustainability

Cons

This organization is weighed down by a culture that prioritizes internal bureaucracy over actually supporting the people who drive revenue. Support functions like accounting, payroll, IT, legal, and recruiting consistently create friction instead of removing it. Processes feel designed for the convenience of those teams rather than the business as a whole. Simple things like expense reporting, travel booking, payroll, or accessing systems are unnecessarily complicated and slow. Training is another weak point. The bar for what qualifies as “training” or “subject matter expertise” is surprisingly low. Sessions often lack depth, practical relevance, and real industry credibility. It’s hard to take them seriously or apply much of what’s taught. There are also too many non-value-added processes: 1) You need to submit tickets just to access basic systems—even when no approval is required. 2) Benefits are overly complex and difficult to understand, with too many niche programs instead of focusing on strong core offerings. 3) The recruiting process is so convoluted it requires long training sessions just to navigate it. On top of that, the company talks a lot about values but seems to miss the basics - consistent, high-quality execution. There’s far too much emphasis on “big moments” and not enough focus on just doing everyday work well. Transparency is poor. When you ask why something is done a certain way, the default answer is “it’s policy” or “it’s how we’ve always done it.” That kind of thinking kills trust and makes it clear that improvement isn’t a priority. There is a lot of feedback forms and listening sessions but nothing changes. Also no communication on what is done with the feedback The biggest issue, though, is HR leadership. The Chief People Officer spent their entire career as a recruiter—and now they’re responsible for the entire HR function. What a joke. It shows in how disconnected HR policies and processes are from actual operational needs.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All