Shared Services - Associate Shared Services GEP Employee Review

5.0
Dec 1, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GEP is rapidly growing management consulting firm focused on Procurement services. It's a great organization filled with friendly professionals who are at the top of their game! Everyone is a specialist in their vertical and are always willing and happy to help out their fellow GEP'er! I am proud to work for GEP and the future looks bright because our products and services are getting the recognition it deserves.

Cons

When a company grows as rapidly as GEP has grown over the last 2 years, there's bound to be some gaps. However the gaps get identified quickly and we push forward to better the company.

avatar
GEP Response
9y
Thank you so much for your review. We truly appreciate your comments, and please know we are as proud to have you as part of the GEP team as you are to work here. We value all of our team members equally and know everyone is important to the growth and success of this company. Keep up the great work, and if you have any specific concerns, please just stop by to chat!

Explore other reviews about GEP

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good employee and customer centric company

Cons

Nothing specific to call out

1.0
Jul 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice and fun people and new office.

Cons

GEP frequently promotes itself as a company that champions diversity, equity, and inclusion. Those values were highlighted as a core part of the company's culture. Employees—particularly those involved in Employee Resource Groups (ERGs)—were routinely asked to volunteer significant amounts of their own time to organize recruiting events, support DEI initiatives, and foster a workplace where people from all backgrounds felt welcome and represented. That is why the decision to invite Nikki Haley as the keynote speaker for this year's GEP Innovate is shocking and unacceptable. Nikki Haley has a well-documented public record of anti-LGBTQ+ positions, Islamophobic rhetoric, and a deeply troubling political history. Choosing to platform—and reportedly pay a substantial speaking fee to—someone whose public record stands in direct opposition to the values GEP claims to champion sends a clear message that those values are conditional when they become inconvenient. What exactly was she expected to contribute to an innovation conference that could not have been offered by one of the countless accomplished leaders whose records actually align with the company's stated commitment to inclusion? For a company that so proudly markets itself as a DEI champion, this decision was profoundly disappointing. It undermines the work of employees who dedicated countless unpaid hours to building an inclusive culture and recruiting diverse talent. Frankly, it was disturbing to see leadership elevate someone whose views are fundamentally at odds with the environment the company asks its employees to create.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All