Technology in systemic breakdown - Cyber Security GIC Employee Review

1.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exposure to large-scale, mission-critical systems

Cons

Technology Group (TG) under the leadership of COO Sam Kim and direction from CEO Chow Kiat has descended into prolonged disorder over the past year, with constant restructures and leadership changes repeatedly disrupting delivery and exhausting teams. Change fatigue is severe, announcements come in predictable cycles, recycling the same language around “resilience” and “adaptability,” yet outcomes on the ground show little improvement. Instead of progress, there is a growing sense of regression. Leadership turnover has eroded continuity to the point where direction is frequently reset before any meaningful execution can take hold. In several cases, senior appointments appear misaligned with the domains they oversee, raising questions about effectiveness and decision-making quality. Initiatives are routinely launched with urgency, only to be reworked, rebranded, or quietly abandoned, creating a pattern of inefficiency and wasted effort. Confidence from internal stakeholders has weakened noticeably. Some business teams have begun building parallel capabilities to shield themselves from ongoing instability, which speaks volumes about the current level of trust in Technology. At the same time, psychological safety remains a concern. Despite official messaging from HR, there is a prevailing sense that speaking up or challenging direction carries risk. Taken together, the environment feels increasingly chaotic and unsustainable, particularly for an institution regarded as a steward of Singapore’s reserves.

Explore other reviews about GIC

5.0
Jun 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company to work for. They pay above fairly, people are friendly and benefits / employee life - work balance is amazing.

Cons

No cons.No cons. no Cons.

1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good vision, good talent (under bad management), market rate compensation

Cons

​Incompetent Leadership: Constant, chaotic reorganizations driven by new senior leads looking for short-term wins rather than sustainable engineering. ​Tone-Deaf Management: Townhalls are heavily curated to ignore genuine feedback regarding burnout and management debt. ​The "Silent Layoff" Strategy: Mass PIPs and aggressive performance grading are being used to quietly trim headcount, destroying team morale. ​Inefficient Ecosystem: Paralyzing security and risk processes block execution at every turn, while engineering teams are expected to run at 200%+ capacity. ​Inefficient HR: A heavy layer of senior HR personnel who offer zero practical guidance, zero empathy, and zero worker protection.

11
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All