What to look out for - Field Service Representative General Atomics Employee Review

1.0
Feb 10, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Although I spent 10 years with General Atomics, going on deployments to countries like Iraq, Kuwait, Niger, Africa and others, The customers I worked with face to face on a regular basis being deployed loved what I did and how I approached and solved each problem as it arose. Although Linden Blue frequented our lab, there was never a feeling that whatever was achieved was noted and showed loyalty.

Cons

The downsides are even after a long period of working for General Atomics, proving my skills and adaptability, there was little or no respect coming back from Managerial staff. Being advanced to tech level VI and wishing for more responsibilities meant nothing. It seemed incompetence was the accepted norm for the Production lab no matter how I tried to improve myself and gain status through determination and focus in my position, it was all for naught. It also was evident that a hostile atmosphere was injected into my workplace with no support forth coming from supervisors. It was a focused aggressive action centered on removing me from the workplace. I was an experienced and skilled technician and having proved myself numerous times, it did not matter according to the changing atmosphere in the Production lab. Seniority and time in position is not accepted as providing the least amount of respect from the supervisory staff.

Explore other reviews about General Atomics

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very good work life balance

Cons

9 hour shifts 4 days a week

3.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mostly good people and skilled engineers that are easy to work with and great to learn from across all groups/locations. There is opportunity to pursue technical areas of interest and to stand out by leading improvement efforts. The company is flexible and often facilitates changes according to interest. Sense of job security generally feels good and stable, the greater GA really backs the Space division. The greater company works on some really interesting and cool things, beyond just defense. Pay is pretty good. Experience with most middle management (of engineers) has been positive, they typically advocate and support their employees.

Cons

Unsure of division leadership and strategic direction. Overall impression is that engineers' perspectives are not adequately weighted in both proposals and certain decisions for active missions. Processes burden performance, though there is intention for constant improvement. Ignoring engineering concerns (i.e. with schedule) + process burdens often result in delays and increased pressure, and therefore a less than ideal working environment at times. Overtime pay is not guaranteed but can be approved. Working with teams in different locations can lead to tension and "silo-ing" (though not always). Space division is becoming mostly defense focused (an industry trend), but would be nice to continue work in the civil earth and space science arena. They also demo'd a nice cafeteria/gathering space for more work/equipment space.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All