All the cons of DoD, and getting worse - Systems Engineer General Atomics Employee Review

2.0
Feb 12, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pros: -personally I thought my salary was pretty good, includes a small %-based yearly bonus -work is really easy and mundane -good work life balance, 9/80s...you can basically just show up and collect your paycheck

Cons

cons: -really depressing, everyone is complacent and does the bare minimum -work is not valued, no recognition. often feel invisible -no upward growth, personally or career wise -no emphasis on training or improvement of your work -bad processes all around, basic things require a lot of work -anyone who is actually valuable is overworked and generally unavailable if you need them -really awful communication and cohesiveness between similar groups. 3 different teams could be working on the same thing and no one would know. -more focus on hitting deliverables rather than any quality of product -feels like a sinking ship lately -handled covid pretty poorly, forced an early return to office and then seems like they just ceased all communications about it

Explore other reviews about General Atomics

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very good work life balance

Cons

9 hour shifts 4 days a week

3.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mostly good people and skilled engineers that are easy to work with and great to learn from across all groups/locations. There is opportunity to pursue technical areas of interest and to stand out by leading improvement efforts. The company is flexible and often facilitates changes according to interest. Sense of job security generally feels good and stable, the greater GA really backs the Space division. The greater company works on some really interesting and cool things, beyond just defense. Pay is pretty good. Experience with most middle management (of engineers) has been positive, they typically advocate and support their employees.

Cons

Unsure of division leadership and strategic direction. Overall impression is that engineers' perspectives are not adequately weighted in both proposals and certain decisions for active missions. Processes burden performance, though there is intention for constant improvement. Ignoring engineering concerns (i.e. with schedule) + process burdens often result in delays and increased pressure, and therefore a less than ideal working environment at times. Overtime pay is not guaranteed but can be approved. Working with teams in different locations can lead to tension and "silo-ing" (though not always). Space division is becoming mostly defense focused (an industry trend), but would be nice to continue work in the civil earth and space science arena. They also demo'd a nice cafeteria/gathering space for more work/equipment space.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All