Horrible work life balance, long hours, little PTO - Anonymous employee General Atomics Employee Review

2.0
Jul 10, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great teammates, no pressure, somewhat flexible schedule

Cons

I’m genuinely puzzled by the praise General Atomics receives for its work-life balance (WLB). In my experience, the WLB is actually quite poor. While the company touts a 9/80 schedule as a perk, the reality is that you’re trading slightly fewer workdays for consistently long, 9.5-hour days. That extra half hour includes a mandatory 30-minute unpaid break, which must be taken within a tightly enforced window. You can’t skip it or shift it to a time that better suits your needs—even if you’re fasting, on a special diet, or simply not hungry. In effect, the company dictates when you eat, with no flexibility. Time off is another major downside. Vacation and sick leave are drawn from the same PTO bank, and accrual is painfully slow. You start with 120 hours per year, which is advertised as “15 days,” but that’s misleading. Since most workdays are 9 hours long, you’re actually only getting about 13 full days off per year. If you get sick, say goodbye to your vacation. The list of company-paid holidays is outdated and lacking. There’s no recognition for MLK Day, Juneteenth, or Indigenous Peoples’/Columbus Day. Worse, when holidays fall on a scheduled off Friday (as the 4th of July did this year), there’s no make-up holiday granted. Many companies offer at least a partial paid shutdown between Christmas and New Year’s, but not General Atomics—you’ll need to dip into your already limited PTO to spend time with your family during school breaks. In short, the benefits may look decent on paper, but the reality is rigid scheduling, limited time off, and an overall lack of flexibility or consideration for employees’ personal needs.

Explore other reviews about General Atomics

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very good work life balance

Cons

9 hour shifts 4 days a week

3.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mostly good people and skilled engineers that are easy to work with and great to learn from across all groups/locations. There is opportunity to pursue technical areas of interest and to stand out by leading improvement efforts. The company is flexible and often facilitates changes according to interest. Sense of job security generally feels good and stable, the greater GA really backs the Space division. The greater company works on some really interesting and cool things, beyond just defense. Pay is pretty good. Experience with most middle management (of engineers) has been positive, they typically advocate and support their employees.

Cons

Unsure of division leadership and strategic direction. Overall impression is that engineers' perspectives are not adequately weighted in both proposals and certain decisions for active missions. Processes burden performance, though there is intention for constant improvement. Ignoring engineering concerns (i.e. with schedule) + process burdens often result in delays and increased pressure, and therefore a less than ideal working environment at times. Overtime pay is not guaranteed but can be approved. Working with teams in different locations can lead to tension and "silo-ing" (though not always). Space division is becoming mostly defense focused (an industry trend), but would be nice to continue work in the civil earth and space science arena. They also demo'd a nice cafeteria/gathering space for more work/equipment space.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All