employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

You can do it, keep on going and don't give up - Administrative Assistant General Motors (GM) Employee Review

5.0
Oct 19, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent company to work for (in spite of current financial problems). Good pay and benefits, excellent support with essential work equipment and excellent work environment. Neat and clean environment, very attuned to safety of employes. I would have a difficult time thinking of something negative to say about working for General Motors. They are an excellent company to work for and even though they have a huge number of employees, I always felt very close to my group. They were very cooperative and worked well as a team.

Cons

Current financial problems make for considerable state of discomfort and concern about future of the company. Newer employees will not receive as generous of benefits.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
May 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Collaborative, welcoming, transparent, work life balance

Cons

I do not have cons at the moment

2.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was able to learn some interesting things in robotics, computer vision, etc. These jobs can be hard to come by, so it was a nice entry point. Plenty of chances to prove your worth, considering the incompetence of some of the managers and leads (but dont expect to be paid for the effort, you gotta show the effort first and you *might* get an early promotion)

Cons

Layoffs are frequent and nonsensical. Absolutely no warning that it will happen, you just wake up one day with the meeting on your calendar. Pay is OK. After being laid off late May, I found a job in a month or two that paid more (150k base -> 180k base) The things I learned were almost entirely self taught. Leads and management provided zero structure. They didnt use jira at all. They didnt write up business requirements for projects. Leads didnt create technical requirements. Milestones were vague. Everything was completely unorganized due to the inexperience of upper management and engineering leadership.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All