employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

No innovation - Senior Software Developer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

2.0
May 7, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive salary. Good 401(k) match

Cons

Innovation stops at the names of the innovation centers. Mostly maintain old software and antique processes. Clueless management mostly doing lip service Quality of new hires is questionable High levels of nepotism No development and growth No training If you are any where close to "ambitious", do not touch this company with 10 foot pole. This company is for people who just likes to collect paycheck and not care about anything else.

avatar
General Motors (GM) Response
7y
Thank you for taking the time to review GM in Glassdoor, we sincerely appreciate any and all comments as we strive to make ourselves a better organization.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
Mar 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very Interesting Work Environment, and very complex machinery at play with employees possessing a wealth of information

Cons

Difficult to integrate yourself into the workflow. Meaningful work is often hard to take ownership of as it's high risk and siloed, or can not afford to be delayed.

2.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was able to learn some interesting things in robotics, computer vision, etc. These jobs can be hard to come by, so it was a nice entry point. Plenty of chances to prove your worth, considering the incompetence of some of the managers and leads (but dont expect to be paid for the effort, you gotta show the effort first and you *might* get an early promotion)

Cons

Layoffs are frequent and nonsensical. Absolutely no warning that it will happen, you just wake up one day with the meeting on your calendar. Pay is OK. After being laid off late May, I found a job in a month or two that paid more (150k base -> 180k base) The things I learned were almost entirely self taught. Leads and management provided zero structure. They didnt use jira at all. They didnt write up business requirements for projects. Leads didnt create technical requirements. Milestones were vague. Everything was completely unorganized due to the inexperience of upper management and engineering leadership.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All