employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

George Washington University

Is this your company?

Great people marred by institutional toxicity - Anonymous employee George Washington University Employee Review

3.0
Jan 3, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You'll work with some thoughtful, warm, and bright colleagues who bring enthusiasm and fresh thinking to their roles. Paid time off is also quite decent, and work quiets down in summertime when students are out.

Cons

Inequitable pay, as the University operates on a "burn and churn" system with entry and even mid level staff positions (i.e. pay them low wages so that they'll quickly move on after they've taken advantage of their tuition remission and gotten advanced degrees). Little to no support or feedback from HR and leadership on a variety of personnel, finance, and other issues. Toxicity within the University born from leadership that is not in touch with the needs and desires of students, faculty and staff. Very little opportunity for professional growth.

Explore other reviews about George Washington University

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people and place. Extremely welcoming community.

Cons

Did not have any cons while working here.

2.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) Tuition Remission is nice and adds a lot to the implicit salary. 2) Work-life balance is typically fairly good. Rarely are you pushing more than 45 hours a week. 3) Depending on your supervisor, you may get decent managering responsibilities quickly.

Cons

1) The pay at GW is significantly below market, especially for quantitative researchers. They try to make up for it with tuition remission but at some point, it isn't worth it. 2) The only way to push one's salary up is to switch jobs within GWU. The annual raise is 2.5%. Managers are able to petition HR to raise it higher but I have never heard of anyone receiving more than 5% and promotions are very rare, even among good managers. 3) Not great for quantitative researchers -- managers are typically more qualitative and thus aren't great at supervision. 4) HR and administration is super slow and often times gets in the way of an efficient office.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All